Misconceptions, conceptual pluralism, and conceptual toolkits: bringing the philosophy of science to the teaching of evolution

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-23 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores how work in the philosophy of science can be used when teaching scientific content to science students and when training future science teachers. I examine the debate on the concept of fitness in biology and in the philosophy of biology to show how conceptual pluralism constitutes a problem for the conceptual change model, and how philosophical work on conceptual clarification can be used to address that problem. The case of fitness exemplifies how the philosophy of science offers tools to resolve teaching difficulties and make the teaching of scientific concepts more adequate to the actual state of affairs in science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Conceptual Engineering Can Learn from the History of Philosophy of Science: Healthy Externalism and Metasemantic Plasticity.Matteo De Benedetto - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (1):1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-12

Downloads
23 (#705,261)

6 months
9 (#355,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas A. C. Reydon
Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

Teaching philosophy of science that matters.Joeri Witteveen & Sara Green - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (2):1-10.

Add more citations