Survival of the fittest: Law of evolution or law of probability? [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 3 (3):349-362 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent issue of Biology and Philosophy, Kenneth Waters argues that the principle of survival of the fittest should be eliminated from the theory of natural selection, because it is an untestable law of probability, and as such, has no place in evolutionary theory. His argument is impressive, but it does not do justice to the practice of biology. The principle of survival of the fittest should not be eliminated from the theory of natural selection because it is important to biological practice: it plays an essential role in explanation and discovery, and in unffying the theory of natural selection.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#419,667)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Function, fitness and disposition.Sandra D. Mitchell - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (1):39-54.
The rebirth of rational morphology.David Resnik - 1994 - Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1):1-14.
Discussion: Leo Buss's the evolution of individuality.David B. Resnik - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (4):453-460.
Adaptationism: Hypothesis or heuristic? [REVIEW]David Resnik - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (1):39-50.

Add more citations