Climate Change and the Threat of Disaster: The Moral Case for Taking Out Insurance at Our Grandchildren's Expense

Political Studies 59 (4):884-99 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is drastic action against global warming essential to avoid impoverishing our descendants? Or does it mean robbing the poor to give to the rich? We do not yet know. Yet most of us can agree on the importance of minimising expected deprivation. Because of the vast number of future generations, if there is any significant risk of catastrophe, this implies drastic and expensive carbon abatement unless we discount the future. I argue that we should not discount. Instead, the rich countries should stump up the funds to support abatement both for themselves and the poor states of the world. Yet to ask the present generation to assume all the costs of drastic mitigation.is unfair.Worse still, it is politically unrealistic.We can square the circle by shifting part of the burden to our descendants. Even if we divert investment from other parts of the economy or increase public debt, future people should be richer, so long as we avert catastrophe. If so, it is fair for them to assume much of the cost of abatement.What we must not do is to expose them to the threat of disaster by not doing enough.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the concept of climate debt: its moral and political value.Jonathan Pickering & Christian Barry - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):667-685.
Global Warming and Our Natural Duties of Justice.Aaron Maltais - 2008 - Dissertation, Uppsala University
Global Justice and Global Climate Change.Duane Windsor - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:23-34.
Climate change and the future: Discounting for time, wealth, and risk.Simon Caney - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):163-186.
The Theory of Justice in a Warming Climate.Jan Kunnas - 2012 - Electronic Green Journal 34 (1).
Intergenerational Justice.Axel Gosseries & Lukas H. Meyer - 2009 - Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Oxford University Press.
Climate Change, Responsibility, and Justice.Dale Jamieson - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):431-445.
Climate Change: A Challenge for Ethics.Evangelos D. Protopapadakis - 2012 - In Walter Leal Filho Evangelos Manolas (ed.), English through Climate Change. Democritus University of Thrace. pp. 167.
Discounting the future, yet again.Geoffrey Brennan - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):259-284.
The Normative Root of the Climate Change Problem.Stephen James Purdey - 2012 - Ethics and the Environment 17 (2):75-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-15

Downloads
931 (#15,794)

6 months
101 (#46,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Rendall
University of Nottingham

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Equality as a moral ideal.Harry Frankfurt - 1987 - Ethics 98 (1):21-43.
Why sufficiency is not enough.Paula Casal - 2007 - Ethics 117 (2):296-326.
Equality, priority, and compassion.Roger Crisp - 2003 - Ethics 113 (4):745-763.

View all 30 references / Add more references