- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Three Kinds of Political Engagement for Philosophy of Science
Science & Education 18 (2):191-197 (2009)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of George A. Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Science 40 (1):153-155.
Review of George Reisch: The Politics of Paradigms. [REVIEW]Adam Tamas Tuboly - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2):605-608.
Logical Empiricism, Politics, and Professionalism.Scott Edgar - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (2):177-189.
Philosophy of Science as First Philosophy: The Liberal Polemics of Ernest Nagel.Eric Schliesser - 2021 - In Matthias Neuber & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Ernest Nagel: Philosophy of Science and the Fight for Clarity. Springer. pp. 233-253.
George Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Francis Remedios - 2006 - Philosophy in Review 26 (3):223-225.
Review: George Reisch. How the cold war transformed philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2005. [REVIEW]John M. Capps - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):167-171.
Philosophy of Science as First Philosophy The Liberal Polemics of Ernest Nagel.Eric Schliesser - 2021 - In Matthias Neuber & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Ernest Nagel: Philosophy of Science and the Fight for Clarity. Springer.
George A. Reisch. The Politics of Paradigms: Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, and the Cold War “Struggle for Men’s Minds.”. [REVIEW]Adam Tamas Tuboly - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2):605-608.
Philosophy of Science, Political Engagement, and the Cold War: An Introduction.Heather Douglas - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (2):157-160.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-02-15
Downloads
15 (#244,896)
6 months
3 (#1,723,834)
2018-02-15
Downloads
15 (#244,896)
6 months
3 (#1,723,834)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Toward Philosophy of Science’s Social Engagement.Angela Potochnik & Francis Cartieri - 2013 - Erkenntnis 79 (Suppl 5):901-916.
Engagement for progress: applied philosophy of science in context.Heather Douglas - 2010 - Synthese 177 (3):317-335.
What’s right about Carnap, Neurath and the Left Vienna Circle thesis: a refutation.Thomas Uebel - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):214-221.
Hegel's Proto-Modernist Conception of Philosophy as Science.Zeyad El Nabolsy - 2020 - Problemata: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 11 (4):81-107.
References found in this work
The Structure of scientific theories.Frederick Suppe (ed.) - 1974 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic.George A. Reisch - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Rise of Scientific Philosophy.Hans Reichenbach - 1951 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2 (8):334-337.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-lc8fp uwo