Persistent evidential discordance

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,484

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A logic for evidential support.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):21-43.
A logic for evidential support (II).L. Jonathan Cohen - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):105-126.
The structure of acceptance and its evidential basis.P. M. Williams - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (4):325-344.
Robustness, discordance, and relevance.Jacob Stegenga - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):650-661.
Corrigendum to: Inference to the Best Explanation in Uncertain Evidential Situations.Borut Trpin & Max Pellert - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (1):355-355.
Evidential Probabilities and Credences.Anna-Maria Asunta Eder - 2023 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 74 (1):1 -23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-29

Downloads
31 (#603,767)

6 months
15 (#164,223)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
What Is a Replication?Edouard Machery - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (4):545-567.
Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis.Felipe Romero - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (11):e12633.
Why Replication is Overrated.Uljana Feest - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):895-905.

View all 28 references / Add more references