‘Beauty’ and the ‘Beautiful’: a Computational Analysis of the Company They Kept Across the Eighteenth-century Corpus

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79 (1):88-107 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a computational enquiry into the different ways in which two words, assumed to be central to the eighteenth-century concept of aesthetics, were used across that century. Using word co-association measures designed specifically for this study, I show the markedly different lexis that surrounded the words ‘beauty’ and ‘beautiful’ in three decades of historical textual data from Eighteenth-Century Collections Online. Having demonstrated that these words were used in very different semantic contexts in the beginning, middle, and end of the century, the article presents semantic network diagrams which further demonstrate the distinctness of noun from adjective. I argue that while ‘beautiful’ is suspended in a semantic space that is recognizably aesthetic, ‘beauty’ is not. Furthermore, that which is deemed ‘beautiful,’ according to the evidence presented here, presents something of a challenge to received narratives of how the concept of aesthetics developed throughout the eighteenth century.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Beautiful Soul: Aesthetic Morality in the Eighteenth Century.Robert E. Norton - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1):62-64.
Beauty.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2000 - In Berys Nigel Gaut & Dominic Lopes (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. New York: Routledge. pp. 307-319.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-09

Downloads
22 (#697,556)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations