Nation-States and Love of Neighbour: Impartiality and the ordo amoris

Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (3):327-345 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is about love of one’s neighbour near and far given humanity’s division into nations. The primary dialogue partner is Peter Singer and his preference utilitarian approach to moral reasoning wherein the challenge is to count the welfare of individuals impartially, regardless—or, at least, with far less regard than is often given—of divisions into nation-states. The claim is made that, despite the considerable and proper challenges from Singer and other so-called new cosmopolitans, it remains possible and, indeed, necessary at the present time for Christian people to work with an account of nation and nationhood as permitted within divine providence. This claim is cast in terms of traditional Christian teaching about the order of love (L. ordo amoris)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selected philosophical essays.Max Scheler - 1973 - Evanston,: Northwestern University Press.
Hanfling on Neighbour Love.Dana M. Radcliffe - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (270):497 - 502.
On Love of Neighbour.Paul Moyaert - 1994 - Ethical Perspectives 1 (4):169-184.
Love and Impartiality.Don Adams - 1993 - American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):223 - 234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-25

Downloads
27 (#587,064)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophic warrants for scriptural reasoning.Peter Ochs - 2006 - Modern Theology 22 (3):465-482.

Add more references