- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Corporate governance predictors of adoption of anti-takeover amendments: An empirical analysis [Book Review]
Journal of Business Ethics 12 (5):371 - 378 (1993)
Abstract
This study of 481 corporations provides an assessment of the relationship between several corporate governance variables (board composition, type of board leadership, officer and director stock holdings, institutional stock holdings, number of majority owners, existence of severance agreements) and adoption of anti-takeover amendments. The results of analysis suggest that the two groups (adopters/non-adopters) differ significantly in regards to these variables.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The theory of pluralism in corporate governance: A conceputal framework and empirical test. [REVIEW]Rick Molz - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (10):789 - 804.
Corporate governance practices in publicly quoted companies in nigeria.Chris Ogbechie & Dimitrios N. Koufopoulos - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):350-381.
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW]Hoje Jo & Maretno A. Harjoto - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):351-383.
Are East Asian Companies Benefiting from Western Board Practices?John Nowland - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1-2):133 - 150.
Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance.Betty S. Coffey & Jia Wang - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1595-1603.
Responsible corporate governance: Towards a stakeholder board of directors?Silvia Ayuso & Antonio Argandoña - unknown
Corporate governance and board effectiveness 2.Richard Leblanc - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (2):106-112.
Corporate governance practices of small cap companies and their financial performance: an empirical study in New Zealand.Krishna Reddy, Stuart Locke, Frank Scrimgeour & Abeyratna Gunasekarage - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):51.
On the antecedents of corporate severance agreements: An empirical assessment. [REVIEW]Dan R. Dalton & Paula L. Rechner - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):455 - 462.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
31 (#515,838)
6 months
5 (#639,314)
2009-01-28
Downloads
31 (#515,838)
6 months
5 (#639,314)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Can business ethics enhance corporate governance? Evidence from a survey of UK insurance executives.S. R. Diacon & C. T. Ennew - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (6):623 - 634.
The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions.Victoria B. McWilliams - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital Disclosure.Ruth L. Hidalgo, Emma García-Meca & Isabel Martínez - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 100 (3):483 - 495.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Has It Brought About Changes in the Boards of Large U. S. Corporations?Alix Valenti - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):401-412.
References found in this work
In defense of sharks moral issues in hostile liquidating takeovers.Robert Almeder & David Carey - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (7):471 - 484.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-pjbg5 uwo