HOT theories of meaning: The link between language and theory of mind

Mind and Language 21 (5):587–596 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Glüer and Pagin (2003) have claimed that autistic speakers are a counterexample to HOT theories of meaning and communication. Through analysis of their argument and a re-examination of the literature, I show that autistic speakers are not a counterexample to HOT theories, but, conversely, that such theories are necessary to account for their communicative peculiarities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#216,755)

6 months
8 (#351,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?