A Review of J.L Mackie’s Criticisms against Religious Experience and Their Answers from Richard Swinburne’s View [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 15 (59):37-58 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Religious experience is an event in which observer confronts with ultimate reality or metaphysical world. J.L. Mackie believes that religious experiences are delusions, fantasies and functions of the observer’s unconscious mind, thus as proofs for God’s existence, are invalid. On the contrary, based on “the principle of credulity” which holds that “things are in fact as they appear unless approved otherwise” and “the principle of testimony” which holds that “we should accept observers’ sayings about intended experience if they are not deluded or deceived”, Richard Swinburne negates Mackie’s criticisms and believes that religious experiences are inductive valid proofs to prove God’s experience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A phenomenal conservative perspective on religious experience.Aaran Burns - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81 (3):247-261.
A Whiteheadian Interpretation of Religious Experience.Frank Wayne Quillen - 1987 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-24

Downloads
4 (#1,013,551)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references