Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900-1955

Journal of the History of Biology 37 (3):588-590 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. [REVIEW]Robert E. Kohler - 2005 - Isis 96 (1):151-153.
Book Reveiw: Karen Rader, Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research. [REVIEW]Susan E. Lederer - 2004 - Journal of the History of Biology 37 (3):588-590.
The least of the sentient beings.Joseph Vining - unknown
Of Mice, Medicine, and Genetics: C. C. Little's Creation of the Inbred Laboratory Mouse, 1909–1918. [REVIEW]Karen A. Rader - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (3):319-343.
Two models of models in biomedical research.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):141-160.
Managing differences in biomedical research: The case of standardizing interferons.Toine Pieters - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29 (1):31-79.
The Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research: Necessity and Justification.Gary L. Francione - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):241-248.
Standardizing a psychomotor test battery for assessing aging in mice.Dk Ingram, Jm Hengemihle, J. Long & P. Garofalo - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):498-498.
The Emergence of "Implant-pets" and "Bone-sheep": Animals as New Biomedical Objects in Orthopaedic Surgery.Martina Schlünder & Thomas Schlich - 2009 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 31 (3-4):429 - 460.
A Review of the Institute of Medicine’s Analysis of using Chimpanzees in Biomedical Research. [REVIEW]Robert C. Jones & Ray Greek - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):481-504.
The protection of laboratory animals: A response to Stephenson.James Parker - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):389-394.
Animals in biomedical research: The undermining effect of the rhetoric of the besieged.John P. Gluck & Steven R. Kubacki - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (3):157 – 173.
Political legitimacy in decisions about experiments in solar radiation management.David R. Morrow, Robert E. Kopp & Michael Oppenheimer - 2013 - In William C. G. Burns & Andrew Strauss (eds.), Climate Change Geoengineering: Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks. Cambridge University Press.
A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):211-228.
Before There Were Standards: The Role of Test Animals in the Production of Empirical Generality in Physiology. [REVIEW]Cheryl A. Logan - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2):329-363.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Evo-Devo as a Trading Zone.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther - 2015 - In Alan C. Love (ed.), Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development. Berlin: Springer Verlag, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
Dogs for Life: Beagles, Drugs, and Capital in the Twentieth Century.Brad Bolman - 2022 - Journal of the History of Biology 55 (1):147-179.

View all 69 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references