The Moral Imperative to Continue Gene Editing Research on Human Embryos

Protein Cell 6 (7):476–479 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The publication of the first study to use gene editing techniques in human embryos (Liang et al., 2015) has drawn outrage from many in the scientific community. The prestigious scientific journals Nature and Science have published commentaries which call for this research to be strongly discouraged or halted all together (Lanphier et al., 2015; Baltimore et al., 2015). We believe this should be questioned. There is a moral imperative to continue this research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing?Eric T. Juengst - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (3):15-23.
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.
Public views on gene editing and its uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-02

Downloads
133 (#137,897)

6 months
9 (#436,446)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford
Chris Gyngell
Australian National University
Jonathan Pugh
University of Oxford
1 more

References found in this work

Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells.K. Devolder - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):366-370.
The ethics of human stem cell research.Gene H. Outka - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (2):175-213.

View all 6 references / Add more references