Schwarzschild Radius Before General Relativity: Why Does Michell-Laplace Argument Provide the Correct Answer? [Book Review]

Foundations of Physics 39 (9):1046-1054 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A famous Newtonian argument by Michell and Laplace, regarding the existence of “dark bodies” and dating back to the end of the 18th century, is able to provide an exact general-relativistic result, namely the exact formula for the Schwarzschild radius. Since general relativity was formulated more than a century after this argument had been issued, it looks quite surprising that such a correct prediction could have been possible. Far from being merely a fortuitous coincidence (as one might justifiably be induced to think), this fact can find a reasonable explanation once the question is approached the other way round, i.e. from the general-relativistic point of view. By reexamining Laplace’s proof from this point of view, we discuss here the reasons why Michell-Laplace argument can be so “unexpectedly" correct in its general-relativistic prediction

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Schwarzschild solutions and their singularities.Nathan Rosen - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (4):517-529.
Gravitation and mass decrease.Richard Schlegel - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (8):781-795.
On the Entropy of Schwarzschild Space-Time.M. D. Pollock - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (5):615-630.
General relativity with a background metric.Nathan Rosen - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (9-10):673-704.
Flavour-oscillation clocks and the geometricity of general relativity.Eleanor Knox - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):433-452.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
32 (#499,934)

6 months
4 (#790,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations