Are Temporary or Permanent Income Payments Better Placed to Boost Demand during Covid-19?

Basic Income Studies 17 (1):15-27 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Covid-19 has sparked calls for a universal basic income as a way of coping with a demand shock caused by the pandemic. Temporary income payments have been part of the emergency response to the pandemic. This paper questions the effectiveness of temporary payments as a way to raise demand. Some observers claim that vouchers are better targeted at sectors hit hard by Covid-19 as people may have a tendency to save than spend from temporary payments. There may be a stronger case for permanent rather than temporary payments if the aim is to boost demand in the economy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Rights of Temporary Migrants.Luara Ferracioli & Christian Barry - 2018 - The Journal of Legal Studies 47 (S1): S149-S168.
Theory of the Consumption Function.Milton Friedman - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
Outline of Article 5 of the OECD Model Convention.João Sérgio Ribeiro - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):295-312.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-30

Downloads
4 (#1,624,434)

6 months
3 (#976,418)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations