Reinterpreting behavior: A human specialization?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):712-713 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tomasello et al. argue that the “small difference that made a big difference” in the evolution of the human mind was the disposition to share intentions. Chimpanzees are said to understand certain mental states (like intentions), but not share them. We argue that an alternative model is better supported by the data: the capacity to represent mental states (and other unobservable phenomena) is a human specialization that co-evolved with natural language.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Chimpanzees Know about Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third Kind.Josep Call & Michael Tomasello - 2005 - In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press. pp. 45--64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#242,375)

6 months
15 (#165,714)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references