The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality

&
Philosophy 71 (276):315-319 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1995, 1996, 2014

ISBN(s)

9781138148185   9780203535806   9780415135559

DOI

10.4324/9780203535806

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality by Karl R. Popper; M. A. Notturno; Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction by Karl R. Popper; M. A. Notturno. [REVIEW]Matteo Motterlini - 1999 - Isis 90:639-641.
The Myth of the Framework: In defence of science and rationality Karl R. Popper, edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, xiii + 229 pp. £27.50.Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In defence of interaction Karl R. Popper, edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, ix + 158 pp. £25. [REVIEW]John Watkins - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (276):315-.
The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality.Mark Amadeus Notturno (ed.) - 1994 - Routledge.
Karl Popper, The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality Reviewed by.Stathis Psillos - 1995 - Philosophy in Review 15 (3):200-201.
The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality.Karl R. Popper - 1994 - In Mark Amadeus Notturno (ed.), The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge. pp. 33-64.
The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. Karl R. Popper, M. A. NotturnoKnowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction. Karl R. Popper, M. A. Notturno. [REVIEW]Matteo Motterlini - 1999 - Isis 90 (3):639-641.
The Myth of the Framework. In Defense of Science and Rationality. [REVIEW]John G. McEvoy - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):388-390.
Popper's Conception of the Rationality Principle in the Social Sciences.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2006 - In Ian Jarvie, David Miller & Karl Milford (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment: Selected Papers from Karl Popper 2002: Volume III: Science. Ashgate.
Myth and Ethics in Business.Aviva Geva - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (4):575-597.
Why in planning the myth of the framework is anything but that.Andreas Faludi - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):381-399.
Karl Popper, The Myth of the Framework. Routledge, London, 1994, cloth £25.00 Karl Popper, Knowledge and the Body–Mind Problem. London, Routledge, 1994, cloth £27.50. [REVIEW]Alexander Bird - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):149-151.
Review of Karl Popper: The Myth of the Framework_; Karl Raimund Popper: _Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction. [REVIEW]Karl Popper & Alexander Bird - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):149-151.
The Myth of the Framework. In Defense of Science and Rationality. [REVIEW]John G. McEvoy - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):388-390.
The Myth of the Framework.Karl R. Popper - 1987 - In Joseph C. Pitt & Marcello Pera (eds.), Rational Changes in Science. Essays on Scientific Reasoning: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 98. Dordrecht: pp. 35-62.
The Normative Requirement of Means-End Rationality and Modest Bootstrapping.Luis Cheng-Guajardo - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):487-503.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
10 (#1,193,699)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Relativism.Maria Baghramian & Adam J. Carter - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.Uwe Peters - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1061-1081.
The Structure of Scientific Theories.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.

View all 93 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references