What can Logic do for Philosophy?

, &
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 22 (1):141-178 (1948)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/aristoteliansupp/22.1.141

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What can Logic do for Philosophy?K. R. Popper, W. C. Kneale & A. J. Ayer - 1948 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 22 (1):141-178.
Symposium: What Can Logic Do for Philosophy?K. R. Popper, W. C. Kneale & A. J. Ayer - 1948 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 22 (4):141 - 178.
Review: K. R. Popper, William Kneale, A. J. Ayer, Symposium: What Can Logic Do for Philosophy? [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):290-290.
Symposium: What Can Logic Do for Philosophy?K. R. Popper, William Kneale & A. J. Ayer - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):290-290.
Popper K. R., Kneale William, and Ayer A. J.. Symposium: What can logic do for philosophy? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XXII, London 1948, pp. 141–178. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):290-290.
Logical positivism and ethics.Jonathan Harrison - 1989 - Cogito 3 (3):179-186.
Ryle G.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 20–29.Lewy C.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 30–39.Popper K. R.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 40–60. [REVIEW]Albert A. Bennett - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):135-135.
Willard V. Quine. On what there is. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951, Appendix, 18 pp. unnumbered. [A reprint of XV 152.] - Peter Thomas Geach. Symposium: On what there is. I. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 125–136. - A. J. Ayer. Symposium: On what there is. II. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 137–148. - W. V. Quine. Symposium: On what there is. III. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 149–160. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (3):222-223.
Britton Karl, Urmson J. O., and Kneale W.. Are necessary truths true by convention? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XXI , pp. 78–133. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):201-202.
Book Review:The Revolution in Philosophy. A. J. Ayer, W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, R. A. Wollheim. [REVIEW]Alan Gewirth - 1957 - Ethics 67 (2):146-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
10 (#1,221,414)

6 months
7 (#491,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Relevant deduction.Gerhard Schurz - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):391 - 437.
How to Prove Hume’s Law.Gillian Russell - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (3):603-632.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references