Franz Rosenzweig and the Systematic Task of Philosophy

Cambridge University Press (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Benjamin Pollock argues that Franz Rosenzweig's The Star of Redemption is devoted to a singularly ambitious philosophical task: grasping 'the All' - the whole of what is - in the form of a system. In asserting Rosenzweig's abiding commitment to a systematic conception of philosophy, this book breaks rank with the assumptions about Rosenzweig's thought that have dominated recent scholarship. Indeed, the Star's importance is often claimed to lie precisely in the way it opposes philosophy's traditional drive for systematic knowledge and upholds instead a 'new thinking' attentive to the existential concerns, the alterity, and even the revelatory dimension of concrete human life. Pollock shows that these very innovations in Rosenzweig's thought are in fact to be understood as part and parcel of the Star's systematic program. But this is only the case, Pollock claims, because Rosenzweig approaches philosophy's traditional task of system in a radically original manner.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God, man, and the world: lectures and essays.Franz Rosenzweig - 1998 - Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Edited by Barbara E. Galli.
Die Rolle des Chores in Franz Rosenzweigs Stern der Erlösung.Luca Bertolino - 2010 - Rosenzweig Jahrbuch / Rosenzweig Yearbook 5:141-159.
Franz Rosenzweig's Religious Philosophy.Yudit Kornberg Greenberg - 1984 - Dissertation, Graduate Theological Union
Franz Rosenzweig.Benjamin Pollock - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-10

Downloads
7 (#1,365,399)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Franz Rosenzweig.Benjamin Pollock - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references