Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes & Utilitarian Jurisprudence

(1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

"Persuasive. A welcome addition." --"The Journal of Legal History" "A masterly exposition of the complex details of Holmes' Supreme Court work." --"The Core Review" In this work, H.L. Pohlman calls for a new interpretation of Holmes as a moderate defender of free speech, and provides a window into Holmes' basic understanding of American constitutionalism. Pohlman argues that Holmes played a crucial role in the development of the idea that the Constitution is a living entity, an idea that differed radically from nineteenth-century antecedents.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint. [REVIEW]Catherine Kemp - 2010 - Philosophical Inquiry 32 (3-4):118-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-13

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Criminal responsibility reconsidered.J. Ralph Lindgren - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (1):89 - 114.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references