Foundations of Physics 28 (9):1417-1424 (1998)

A physical framework has been proposed which describes manifestly covariant relativistic evolution using a scalar time τ. Studies in electromagnetism, measurement, and the nature of time have demonstrated that in this framework, electromagnetism must be formulated in terms of τ-dependent fields. Such an electromagnetic theory has been developed. Gravitation must also use of τ-dependent fields, but many references do not take the metric's dependence on τ fully into account. Others differ markedly from general relativity in their formulation. In contrast, this paper outlines steps towards a τ-dependent classical intrinsic formulation of gravitation, patterned after general relativity, which we call parametrized general relativity (PGR). Given the existence of a preferred foliation, the Hamiltonian constraint is removed. We find that some nonmetricity in the connection is allowed, unlike in general relativity. Conditions on the allowable nonmetricity are found. Consideration of the initial value problem confirms that the metric signature should normally be O(3, 2) rather than O(4, 1). Following the lead of earlier works, we argue that concatenation (integration over τ) is unnecessary for relating parametrized physics to experience, and propose an alternative to it. Finally, we compare and contrast PGR with other relevant gravitational theories
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1018801126703
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Off-Shell Fields and Pauli-Villars Regularization.J. Frastai & L. P. Horwitz - 1995 - Foundations of Physics 25 (10):1495-1510.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Flat Spacetime Gravitation with a Preferred Foliation.J. B. Pitts & W. C. Schieve - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (7):1083-1104.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Flat Spacetime Gravitation with a Preferred Foliation.J. B. Pitts & W. C. Schieve - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (7):1083-1104.
The Ontology of General Relativity.Gustavo E. Romero - forthcoming - In M. Novello & S. E. Perez Bergliaffa (eds.), General Relativity and Gravitation. Cambridge University Press.
On the Role of Special Relativity in General Relativity.Harvey R. Brown - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):67 – 81.
The Mathematical Basis for Physical Laws.R. Eugene Collins - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (5):743-785.
Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic?Roger Jones - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
Polarizable-Vacuum (PV) Approach to General Relativity.H. E. Puthoff - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (6):927-943.
Singularities and Scalar Fields: Matter Theory and General Relativity.James Mattingly - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S395-.
On the Foundation of the Principle of Relativity.Øyvind Grøn & Kjell Vøyenli - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (11):1695-1733.
Gravitation and Mass Decrease.Richard Schlegel - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (8):781-795.
R×S 3 Special Theory of Relativity.M. Carmeli - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (12):1263-1273.


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #253,485 of 2,519,575 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,575 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes