On Understanding ‘Probably’ and Other Modal Qualifiers

Abstract

An examination of several approaches to the force of ‘probably’, when used to qualify the conclusions of arguments and inferences. Among the views examined are those of Toulmin and Wilfrid Sellars. The paper recommends taking the utterance of “Probably p’ to be licensing or authorizing the adoption of a particular doxastic attitude toward p, and offers a functional account of that particular doxastic attitude, namely expecting that p will turn out to be the case.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Understanding and Essence.Anand Jayprakash Vaidya - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):811-833.
Impossibilia and Modally Tensed Predication.Takashi Yagisawa - 2015 - Acta Analytica 30 (4):317-323.
A Modal Logic of Information.Krystyna Misiuna - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (1):33-51.
Moore problems in full dynamic doxastic logic.Krister Segerberg - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):95-110.
A Modal Logic of Metaphor.Krister Segerberg - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):337-347.
Inverse Images of Box Formulas in Modal Logic.Lloyd Humberstone - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1031-1060.
Quine on Opacity in Modal and Doxastic Contexts.Mark William Dickson - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
11 (#1,130,421)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?