Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 41 (2):291-298 (1998)

Abstract
Scholars Karl R. Popper and Thomas S. Kuhn developed new frameworks that helped shape practical science policies and contributed to a greater understanding of the power and limitations of science. Popper did not accept induction as a method of arriving at scientific conclusions and rejected the justification of scientific theories and hypotheses. On the other hand, Kuhn advocated the progress of science and accepted some principles of scientific practices, including law, theory, instrumentation and application.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pbm.1998.0054
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kuhnenstein: Or, the Importance of Being Read.Steve Fuller - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):480-498.
Kuhn Vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science, Part II: How to Strike the Balance.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):161-168.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-23

Total views
15 ( #682,629 of 2,461,941 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,127 of 2,461,941 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes