Formal Democracy, Structural Violence, and the Possibility of “Perpetual Peace”

Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 21 (1):31-50 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I revisit and evaluate Kant’s prerequisites for “perpetual peace,” including the claim, central to contemporary political rhetoric, that formal democracy produces peace. I argue that formal democracy alone is insufficient to address the kinds of deep-rooted structural violence that ultimately manifest interrorism and other forms of direct violence. I claim that the attempt to eliminate structural violence, and so achieve real “perpetual peace,” requires a moresubstantive sort of democracy, of which the United States and the West remain poor examples. It requires a political critique that goes deeper than just thecritique of state power and government action. This paper tries to develop that critique through a conception of structural violence, and of participatory parity asan overarching standard of redress for this type of violence in all of its forms

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
46 (#345,620)

6 months
13 (#194,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Pierce
Saint Mary's College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Oppression.Marilyn Frye - 2000 - In Lorraine Code (ed.), Encyclopedia of feminist theories. New York: Routledge. pp. 370.
On systematically distorted communication.Jürgen Habermas - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):205-218.
The state as the mystical foundation of authority.Brian T. Trainor - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):767-779.

Add more references