Mobility decisions within couples

, &
Theory and Decision 84 (2):149-180 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We analyze couples mode choice, focusing on the interdependence of spouses’ decisions. We set up a discrete collective model in which spouses with competing objectives reach a Pareto optimal decision, and we apply it to Paris region. We estimate the determinants of the bargaining power using this collective model. To control for the endogeneity of car ownership, we finally model the joint choice of car ownership and mode. Econometric estimations show that spouses’ values of time driving alone and together are significantly different.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11238-017-9648-2

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance. [REVIEW]André de Palma, Nathalie Picard & Anthony Ziegelmeyer - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (1):45-64.
Academic mobility in the context of linked lives.Marta Vohlídalová - 2014 - Human Affairs 24 (1):89-102.
Religious perspectives on embryo donation and research.Ian H. Kerridge, Christopher F. C. Jordens, Rod Benson, Ross Clifford, Rachel A. Ankeny, Damien Keown, Bernadette Tobin, Swasti Bhattacharyya, Abdulaziz Sachedina, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann & Brian Edgar - 2010 - Clinical Ethics 5 (1):35-45.
Equality via mobility: Why socioeconomic mobility matters for relational equality, distributive equality, and equality of opportunity.Govind Persad - 2015 - Social Philosophy and Policy 31 (2):158-179.
Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences. [REVIEW]Mohammed Abdellaoui, Olivier L’Haridon & Corina Paraschiv - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (2):175-191.
On the move: mobility in the modern Western world.Tim Cresswell - 2006 - New York: Routledge.
Autonomy and couples’ joint decision-making in healthcare.Pauline E. Osamor & Christine Grady - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):3.
O dyskryminacji par jednopłciowych.Krzysztof Saja - 2012 - Diametros 34:92–115.
Response to “Cloning and Infertility” by Carson Strong.Timothy F. Murphy - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):364-368.
Response to “Cloning and Infertility” by Carson Strong - Entitlement to Cloning.Timothy F. Murphy - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):364-368.
Migrations or Nomadism: How Glaciation Reveals Historical Models of Mobility.Jacques Legrand - 2008 - Diogenes 55 (2):97 - 102.
Moral reasoning in judicial decisions on same-sex marriage.Alicia R. Ouellette - manuscript
Mobility as involvement: on the role of involvement in the design of mobile support systems for industrial application. [REVIEW]Daniel Fallman - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (1):43-52.
Luck, Fairness, and Professional Mobility.David K. Chan - 2014 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 21 (1):1-11.
Couples face au cancer.Nadine Proia-Lelouey & Sylvie Lemoignie - 2012 - Dialogue: Families & Couples 197 (3):69-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-29

Downloads
7 (#1,381,358)

6 months
2 (#1,185,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references