In defence of 'partially clad' bare particulars

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):155 – 158 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, Richard Brian Davis argues that 'bare particulars [as defended by J. P. Moreland] face several serious shortcomings'[2003: 547]. I argue that Davis's two principal criticisms fall flat.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Brave New Bare Particularism.Richard Davis - 2004 - Modern Schoolman 81 (4):267-273.
Bare particulars and individuation reply to Mertz.J. P. Moreland & Timothy Pickavance - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):1 – 13.
No bare particulars.Andrew M. Bailey - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):31-41.
"Bare particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
'Partially clad' Bare Particulars Exposed.Richard Brian Davis - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):534 – 548.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
128 (#141,820)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Pickavance
Biola University

Citations of this work

Object.Bradley Rettler & Andrew M. Bailey - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1.
No bare particulars.Andrew M. Bailey - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):31-41.
Load bare-ing particulars.Nathan Wildman - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1419-1434.
Bare Particulars and Constituent Ontology.Robert K. Garcia - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (2):149-159.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Bare particulars and individuation reply to Mertz.J. P. Moreland & Timothy Pickavance - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):1 – 13.
'Partially clad' Bare Particulars Exposed.Richard Brian Davis - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):534 – 548.

Add more references