- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Unexamined Cup is not Worth Drinking
In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 34–45 (2011-03-04)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: What Is It Like to Be a Philosopher of Coffee? What Is It Like to Drink Coffee? Why Is the Unexamined Cup Not Worth Drinking?Author's Profile
the unexamined cup ‐ not worth drinking what it means to be a philosopher of coffee ‐ like something to be a coffee drinker philosopher Thomas Nagel, arguing ‐ that consciousness is, by its very nature, experiential consciousness, that there really is something ‐ that it's like to be conscious or, as he argued, to be a bat something‐that‐it's‐like to be a barista ‐ or coffee connoisseur, but, unlike being a bat coffee drinkers experience, something ‐ that we too can experience Frank Jackson's famous “Mary” ‐ an experiment generating different approaches, learning about subjective experiences Jackson, asking, what will happen when Mary ‐ released from her black and white room, or is given a color television monitor standard terminology that coffee connoisseurs use ‐ “geeks” to describe features of coffees Hume, arguing when it comes to commonsense approaches ‐ to aesthetic judgments, two equally prevalent views exist
My notes
Similar books and articles
The unexamined cup is not worth drinking.Kristopher G. Phillips - 2011 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee - Philosophy for Everyone: Grounds for Debate. Wiley-Blackwell.
Editors' Introduction.Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 1–6.
Three Cups.Will Buckingham - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 125–137.
Coffee and the Good Life.Lori Keleher - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 228–238.
Café Noir.Brook J. Sadler - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 100–112.
The Philosopher's Brew.Bassam Romaya - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 113–124.
Coffee.Mark Pendergrast - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 7–24.
Samsāra in a Coffee Cup.Steven Geisz - 2011-03-04 - In Fritz Allhoff, Scott F. Parker & Michael W. Austin (eds.), Coffee. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 46–58.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
11 (#1,145,893)
6 months
7 (#592,867)
2023-06-15
Downloads
11 (#1,145,893)
6 months
7 (#592,867)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo