Redundant truth

Ratio 5 (1):24-37 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A strong and weak version of the redundancy theory of truth are distinguished. An argument put forth by Michael Dummett concludes that the weak version is vitiated by truth-value gaps. The weak version is defended against this argument. The strong version, however, is vitiated by truth-value gaps.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two concepts of truth.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 70 (1):35 - 58.
New wave deflationism.Nic Damnjanovic - 2010 - In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 45--58.
Theories of truth and truth-value gaps.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1993 - Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (6):551 - 559.
Don't forget about the correspondence theory of truth.Marian David - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
The transparency of truth.ME Kalderon - 1997 - Mind 106 (423):475-497.
Naïve truth-conditions and meaning.Lionel Shapiro - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):265–277.
Weak and strong theories of truth.Michael Sheard - 2001 - Studia Logica 68 (1):89-101.
Ramsey on truth and truth on Ramsey.Pierre Le Morvan - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):705 – 718.
Frege’s Gedanken Are Not Truth Conditions.Ari Maunu - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (2):231-238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
46 (#344,113)

6 months
5 (#626,659)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Hugly
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references