Abstract

Does it really make no difference if you're black or white, boy or girl, male or female? Is it the dance orperformance itself that produces the body, the identity? Judith Butler argues that gender is aperformative citation, a reiteration of an always already derived identity that takes place within aneconomy of heterosexuality.[1] So what happens when a body performs the so-called 'wrong' gender?Can we think of this as a subversive action in and of itself? To do so Butler argues would assume, firstly,that the performer has the ability and agency to consciously choose his/her own gender and, secondly,that the performance somehow takes place outside of the juridical regime that constrains and bounds itsconstituents. Central to Butler's thesis is that agency is affective; that is to say, agency can only beeffected from a gendered position, therefore the subject does not exist prior to its agency, rather isconstituted as the very affect of agency. Despite appearances these presuppositions are not counter to,but rather primary to Butler's reading [2] of gender and subversion. So when is drag subversive andwhen is it the reinstatement of hegemonic norms? In Gender Trouble Butler argues that drag is"potentially" subversive; but on what grounds does she assert this? And why is it that when she is laterforced to clarify her position in response to misreadings, she states that drag is not necessarily subversive?