‘I am not what I am’: Paradox and indirect communication – the case of the comic god and the dramaturgical self

Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 1 (2):225-236 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An exploration of the self in dramaturgical societies: This is the double, duplicitous, witty self, the one who communicates indirectly through characters and masks, the self who is a personality, who knowingly plays a role on the public stage, and who inhabits a wry, not to say awry, paradoxical world created by a mischievous comic God. A motley bunch of characters wander across the stage of this article. These include recusant Catholics, American sociologists, theologians of paradox, philosophers of comedy, Oscar Schindler, Mick Jagger, William Shakespeare, G.K. Chesterton, as well as various assorted epicurean puritans, inventive liars, elusive playwrights, pompous intellectuals, sleuthing heroes from detective fiction, ambitious pretenders, satirists of newspaper folly, media nitwits, boys playing girls playing boys, and, if you are really good, girls playing boys playing girls. All of them bearing testament to Viola's immortal line: I am not what I am.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Paradox and communication.Peter Murphy - 2010 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 1 (2):153-160.
Illusion and satire in Kierkegaard's postscript.John Lippitt - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):451-466.
Kierkegaard on Indirect Communication, the Crowd, and a Monstrous Illusion.Antony Aumann - 2010 - In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Point of View. Macon, GA, USA: Mercer University Press. pp. 295-324.
Humour and irony in Kierkegaard's thought.John Lippitt - 2000 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
How Indirect Can Indirect Utilitarianism Be?Eric Wiland - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):275-301.
God & the modern world.Julia Watkin - 2005 - Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Darwin the writer.George Levine - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
To Be as No‐One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication.Vanessa Rumble - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
31 (#504,675)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Murphy
University of Indianapolis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references