On Transfinite Levels of the Ershov Hierarchy

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):220-221 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this thesis, we study Turing degrees in the context of classical recursion theory. What we are interested in is the partially ordered structures $\mathcal {D}_{\alpha }$ for ordinals $\alpha <\omega ^2$ and $\mathcal {D}_{a}$ for notations $a\in \mathcal {O}$ with $|a|_{o}\geq \omega ^2$.The dissertation is motivated by the $\Sigma _{1}$ -elementary substructure problem: Can one structure in the following structures $\mathcal {R}\subsetneqq \mathcal {D}_{2}\subsetneqq \dots \subsetneqq \mathcal {D}_{\omega }\subsetneqq \mathcal {D}_{\omega +1}\subsetneqq \dots \subsetneqq \mathcal {D}$ be a $\Sigma _{1}$ -elementary substructure of another? For finite levels of the Ershov hierarchy, Cai, Shore, and Slaman [Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 12, p. 1250005] showed that $\mathcal {D}_{n}\npreceq _{1}\mathcal {D}_{m}$ for any $n < m$. We consider the problem for transfinite levels of the Ershov hierarchy and show that $\mathcal {D}_{\omega }\npreceq _{1}\mathcal {D}_{\omega +1}$. The techniques in Chapters 2 and 3 are motivated by two remarkable theorems, Sacks Density Theorem and the d.r.e. Nondensity Theorem.In Chapter 1, we first briefly review the background of the research areas involved in this thesis, and then review some basic definitions and classical theorems. We also summarize our results in Chapter 2 to Chapter 4. In Chapter 2, we show that for any $\omega $ -r.e. set D and r.e. set B with $D<_{T}B$, there is an $\omega +1$ -r.e. set A such that $D<_{T}A<_{T}B$. In Chapter 3, we show that for some notation a with $|a|_{o}=\omega ^{2}$, there is an incomplete $\omega +1$ -r.e. set A such that there are no a-r.e. sets U with $A<_{T}U<_{T}K$. In Chapter 4, we generalize above results to higher levels. We investigate Lachlan sets and minimal degrees on transfinite levels and show that for any notation a, there exists a $\Delta ^{0}_{2}$ -set A such that A is of minimal degree and $A\not \equiv _T U$ for all a-r.e. sets U.prepared by Cheng Peng.E-mail: [email protected].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Yet Another Ideal Version of the Bounding Number.Rafał Filipów & Adam Kwela - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):1065-1092.
Variations on determinacy and ℵω1.Ramez L. Sami - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (2):721-731.
Muchnik degrees and cardinal characteristics.Benoit Monin & André Nies - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (2):471-498.
Degrees of difficulty of generalized r.e. separating classes.Douglas Cenzer & Peter G. Hinman - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (7-8):629-647.
Goodness in the enumeration and singleton degrees.Charles M. Harris - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (6):673-691.
A criterion for the strong cell decomposition property.Somayyeh Tari - 2023 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 62 (7):871-887.
Some remarks on category of the real line.Kyriakos Keremedis - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (3):153-162.
Ideals with Smital properties.Marcin Michalski, Robert Rałowski & Szymon Żeberski - 2023 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 62 (5):831-842.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-14

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
3 (#1,046,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references