Justifying (or Not) the Office of Trusteeship With Particular Reference to Massively Discretionary Trusts

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 34 (2):365-390 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article2 I examined the nature of private law offices, and here I extend that analysis to consider the trustee-beneficiary relationship where the trust is of a kind that Lionel Smith has called a “massively discretionary trust.”3 After considering some of the problematic legal features of such trusts, I shall probe the morally problematic features that these trusts present.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sovereign Trusteeship and Empire.Andrew Fitzmaurice - 2015 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16 (2):447-472.
J.H. Newman’s lecture “The Office of Justifying Faith”.Alexander Mishura - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 53 (3):203-208.
Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples.Ian Dahlman & Evan Fox-Decent - 2015 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16 (2):507-534.
Pension funds governance: An overview of the role of trustees.Nada Kakabadse & Andrew Kakabadse - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):3-26.
Responsible and Respectful Romance at Work.Cathy Driscoll - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:62-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-27

Downloads
8 (#1,310,468)

6 months
6 (#509,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references