How Demonstratives Denote

Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):91-104 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Focusing on the simple demonstrative ‘that’ and demonstrative expressions of the form ‘that F,’ this paper reviews four accounts of what determines the denotations of demonstratives—the description theory, according to which the work is done by a proper definite description associated with the demonstrative; the causal theory, according to which it is done by a non-deviant causal chain connecting the object and the demonstrative; the demonstration theory, according to which it is done by a demonstration accompanying the demonstrative; and the mental reference theory, according to which it is done by the mental act of reference that the demonstrative expresses—and it offers evidence of the superiority of the mental reference theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Demonstratives in philosophy and linguistics.Lynsey Wolter - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):451-468.
The Presidential Address: Where Demonstratives Meet Vagueness: Possible Languages.Adam Morton - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):1 - 18.
Complex demonstratives, QI uses, and direct reference.Jeffrey C. King - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):99-117.
Complex demonstratives and their singular contents.David Braun - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (1):57-99.
Beliefs, dispositions and demonstratives.Eric Russert Kraemer - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63 (2):167-176.
On the Semantics of Simple and Complex Demonstratives in English.Michael Pendlebury - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):487-505.
Bare-Boned Demonstratives.Stefano Predelli - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):547-562.
Analyzing mental demonstratives.Greg Jarrett - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 84 (1):49-62.
Language and Mind.James Tomberlin (ed.) - 2003 - Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
44 (#360,874)

6 months
6 (#518,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Pendlebury
North Carolina State University

Citations of this work

Demonstratives, context-sensitivity, and coherence.Michael Devitt - 2024 - Linguistics and Philosophy 47 (2):317-339.
Stalnaker on Inquiry.Michael Pendlebury - 1987 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 16 (3):229-272.
On the Semantics of Simple and Complex Demonstratives in English.Michael Pendlebury - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):487-505.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references