A Response to Brian Welter’s Review of Peter Redpath’s The Moral Psychology of St. Thomas: An Introduction to Ragamuffin Ethics

Studia Gilsoniana 7 (2):373–389 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main purpose of this response is twofold, to: (1) acknowledge and elaborate on aspects of Welter’s review that highlight key points in Redpath’s book, and (2) make some precisions and amplifications so that both authors can be better appreciated for what they offer in their works to contemporary readers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Foundations of Constitutional Thought. [REVIEW]Peter A. Redpath - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (4):879-881.
Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. [REVIEW]Brian Welter - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (4):727-730.
Peter Redpath’s Philosophy of History.Curtis L. Hancock - 2016 - Studia Gilsoniana 5 (1):55-93.
Medicine and Religion: A Historical Introduction, by Gary B. Ferngren.Brian Welter - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (4):788-791.
Redpath on the Nature of Philosophy.Robert A. Delfino - 2016 - Studia Gilsoniana 5 (1):33–53.
Review. [REVIEW]Peter Redpath - 2005 - The Thomist 69:484-488.
Review. [REVIEW]Peter Redpath - 1995 - The Thomist 59:489-493.
Being and Beauty. [REVIEW]Peter A. Redpath - 2011 - Review of Metaphysics 65 (1):164-166.
Being and Beauty. [REVIEW]Peter A. Redpath - 2011 - Review of Metaphysics 65 (1):164-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-10

Downloads
4 (#1,617,803)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations