Three Approaches to Logical Correctness

Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-35 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper outlines three broad ways one might think about logical correctness: the Realist approach, the One-Language approach and my own Neo-Carnapian view. Although the realist and one-language views have dominated the philosophy of logic in recent years, I argue against them, favouring of the Neo-Carnapian approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Logical Realism.Michael D. Resnik - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):181-194.
A Survey of Logical Realism.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2021 - Synthese 198 (5):4775-4790.
Logic as Metaphysics.Nick Zangwill - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy 112 (10):517-550.
Disagreement about logic from a pluralist perspective.Erik Stei - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (11):3329-3350.
Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence.Erik Stei - 2023 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carnap, Conventions, and Circularity.Carl Egerton - 2013 - Discipline filosofiche. 23 (1):79-98.
Logical Pluralism.J. C. Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by Greg Restall.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-16

Downloads
20 (#757,502)

6 months
20 (#173,941)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gareth Rhys Pearce
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references