Neuroeconomics Studies

Analyse & Kritik 29 (1):47-59 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neuroeconomics has the potential to fundamentally change the way economics is done. This article identifies the ways in which this will occur, pitfalls of this approach, and areas where progress has already been made. The value of neuroeconomics studies for social policy lies in the quality, replicability, and relevance of the research produced. While most economists will not contribute to the neuroeconomics literature, we contend that most economists should be reading these studies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prospecting neuroeconomics.Andreas Ortmann - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):431-448.
Neuroeconomics and Confirmation Theory.Christopher Clarke - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (2):195-215.
Comments on neuroeconomics.Ariel Rubinstein - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):485-494.
Function and Mechanism: the metaphysics of neuroeconomics.Michiru Nagatsu - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):197-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-11

Downloads
39 (#408,568)

6 months
4 (#790,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Why is economics not an evolutionary science?Thorstein Veblen & Jean Boulton - 2010 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 12 (2):41-69.
Altruistic Punishment in Humans.Ernst Fehr & Simon Gächter - 2002 - Nature 415 (6868):137--140.

Add more references