Eliminating the ‘Impossible’: Recent Progress on Local Measurement Theory for Quantum Field Theory

Foundations of Physics 54 (3):1-75 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Arguments by Sorkin (Impossible measurements on quantum fields. In: Directions in general relativity: proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland, vol 2, pp 293–305, 1993) and Borsten et al. (Phys Rev D 104(2), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.025012 ) establish that a natural extension of quantum measurement theory from non-relativistic quantum mechanics to relativistic quantum theory leads to the unacceptable consequence that expectation values in one region depend on which unitary operation is performed in a spacelike separated region. Sorkin [ 1 ] labels such scenarios ‘impossible measurements’. We explicitly present these arguments as a no-go result with the logical form of a reductio argument and investigate the consequences for measurement in quantum field theory (QFT). Sorkin-type impossible measurement scenarios clearly illustrate the moral that Microcausality is not by itself sufficient to rule out superluminal signalling in relativistic quantum theories that use Lüders’ rule. We review three different approaches to formulating an account of measurement for QFT and analyze their responses to the ‘impossible measurements’ problem. Two of the approaches are: a measurement theory based on detector models proposed in Polo-Gómez et al. (Phys Rev D, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.105.065003 ) and a measurement framework for algebraic QFT proposed in Fewster and Verch (Commun Math Phys 378(2):851–889, 2020). Of particular interest for foundations of QFT is that they share common features that may hold general morals about how to represent measurement in QFT. These morals are about the role that dynamics plays in eliminating ‘impossible measurements’, the abandonment of the operational interpretation of local algebras \({\mathcal {A}}(O)\) as representing possible operations carried out in region _O_, and the interpretation of state update rules. Finally, we examine the form that the ‘impossible measurements’ problem takes in histories-based approaches and we discuss the remaining challenges.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A No-Go Result on Observing Quantum Superpositions.Guang Ping He - 2024 - Foundations of Physics 54 (2):1-11.
Call for papers.[author unknown] - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (2):331-332.
Book review. [REVIEW]Roy Srensen - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (8):1103-1109.
Preface.[author unknown] - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (6):873-874.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):1023-1025.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (4):651-653.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (2):345-346.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (12):1827-1828.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (3):499-501.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (1):177-178.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (11):1735-1736.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-09

Downloads
4 (#1,635,260)

6 months
4 (#837,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Doreen Fraser
University of Waterloo
Maria Papageorgiou
Coventry University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references