Romanian Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8 (1):21-31 (2014)
Abstract |
This paper discusses some political implications of humor, using as a point of departure the mechanisms that explain the sources of the comical. First, I briefly present the main explanations offered for why we laugh. I then focus on the cognitive view proposed Hurley, Dennett and Adams, according to which humor carries out the epistemic function of eliminating the errors that covertly entered a mental space. In the second section of the paper, I present two accounts of how liberalism continues to extend the scope of individual liberties. I use these views on liberalism as a background for my analysis of the political implications of humor, advancing the claim that, as a result of its epistemic function, humor has a strong conservative bias.
|
Keywords | humor redescriptions oppression conservatism liberalism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Inside Jokes: Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind.Matthew M. Hurley, Daniel Clement Dennett & Reginald B. Adams - 2011 - MIT Press.
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
"How Humor Works" Introduction - The "Holy Grail" Humor Theory in One Page.Ernest Garrett - manuscript
The Rejection of Humor in Western Thought.John Morreall - 1989 - Philosophy East and West 39 (3):243-265.
Can We Be Funny? The Social Responsibility of Political Humor.Jason T. Peifer - 2012 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (4):263-276.
How Many Feminists Does It Take To Make A Joke? Sexist Humor and What's Wrong With It.Memo Bergmann - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (1):63-82.
An Existentialist Account of the Role of Humor Against Oppression.Chris A. Kramer - 2013 - Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 26 (4).
Humor and Enlightenment, Part II: The Theory Applied.Peter H. Karlen - 2016 - Contemporary Aesthetics 14.
How Many Feminists Does It Take to Make A Joke? Sexist Humor and What's Wrong with It.Merrie Bergmann - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (1):63 - 82.
Kierkegaard’s View of Humor: Must Christians Always Be Solemn?C. Stephen Evans - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):176-186.
Humor Appreciation as Function of Religious Dimensions.Vassilis Saroglou - 2002 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 24 (1):144-153.
Is There a Role for Humor in the Midst of Conflict?Nancy Potter - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:103-123.
Is There a Role for Humor in the Midst of Conflict?Nancy Potter - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:103-123.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-12-20
Total views
114 ( #101,520 of 2,499,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #80,276 of 2,499,748 )
2017-12-20
Total views
114 ( #101,520 of 2,499,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #80,276 of 2,499,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads