Autonomous Weapon System: Debating Legal–Ethical Consideration and Meaningful Human Control Challenges in the Military Environment

In Sangeetha Menon, Saurabh Todariya & Tilak Agerwala (eds.), AI, Consciousness and The New Humanism: Fundamental Reflections on Minds and Machines. Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 243-258 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The human experience of warfare is changing with the introduction of AI in the field of advance weapon technology. Particularly, in the last five years, autonomous weapon system (AWS) has generated intense debate globally over the potential benefit and potential problems associated with these systems. Military planners understand that AWS can perform the most difficult and complex tasks, with or without human interference and, therefore, can significantly reduce military casualties and save costs. These systems act as force multipliers to counter security threats. On the other hand, political pundits and public intellectuals opine that AWS, without human control, can lead to highly problematic ethical and legal consequences, and some even claiming that it is unethical to allow machines control the life and death of a human being. Several prominent public intellectuals, including influential figures like Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak called for banning of “offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control”. But on the contrary, the militaries believe that the AWS can perform better without human control and follow legal and ethical rules better than soldiers. The debate over the AWS is a continuous one. This chapter will look into the emergence of AWS, its future potential and how it will impact future war scenarios, focussing thereby on the debate over the ethical–legal use of AWS and the viewpoints of military planners.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meaningful Human Control – and the Politics of International Law.Thilo Marauhn - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 207-218.
Dehumanization: Is There a Legal Problem Under Article 36?William Boothby - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 21-52.
Can AI Weapons Make Ethical Decisions?Ross W. Bellaby - 2021 - Criminal Justice Ethics 40 (2):86-107.
Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Clarification.Nathan Gabriel Wood - 2023 - Journal of Military Ethics 22 (1):18-32.
Autonomous Weapon Systems: Failing the Principle of Discrimination.Ariel Guersenzvaig - 2018 - IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 37 (1):55-61.
Feasible Precautions in Attack and Autonomous Weapons.Jeffrey S. Thurnher - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 99-117.
Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Military Informatics (OpenPhD ) : Lethal Autonomy of Weapons is Designed and/or Recessive.Nyagudi Nyagudi Musandu - 2016-12-09 - Dissertation, Openphd (#Openphd) E.G. Wikiversity Https://En.Wikiversity.Org/Wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy , Etc.
Reasons for Meaningful Human Control.Herman Veluwenkamp - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (4):1-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-21

Downloads
3 (#1,717,036)

6 months
3 (#984,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references