Malpractice arising from negligent psychotherapy: Ethical, legal, and clinical implications of Osheroff V. chestnut Lodge

Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):175 – 197 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditionally, there have been few legal actions brought against psychotherapists that allege negligent psychotherapy and negligent treatment of psychiatric disorders. However, in the case of Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge, a patient-physician (Dr. OsheroE) sued Chestnut Lodge, a private psychiatric facility, for negligence based on the staff's decision to apply a psychodynamic model of treatment (through psychotherapy) and not a biological model. The case sparked a heated debate between adherents of the psychodynamic model and those of the biological model. This article explores the implications of the Osheroff litigation for mental health professionals. It is proposed that an interactive informed consent process be used to protect psychotherapists against Osheroff-type litigation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed consent and the psychiatric patient.A. R. Dyer & S. Bloch - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (1):12-16.
The Oxford handbook of psychotherapy ethics.M. Trachsel (ed.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#203,975)

6 months
16 (#218,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The silent world of doctor and patient.Jay Katz - 1984 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
The Common Law.Oliver Wendell Holmes - 1991 - Courier Corporation.

Add more references