Outlines of the Theory of Choice

The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 26:60-68 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are two distinctions of orientation or of intention of a subject toward any phenomenon: "to" or "from" it, attraction or repulsion, acceptance or rejection. The +/- acceptability or pleasantness/unpleasantness of a phenomenon to a subject is the term indicating his or her +/- orientation to the perceived phenomenon. There are six components of the stream of human consciousness: contact senses, distant senses and emotions. Only four of them possess their own acceptability or pleasantness. Pleasantness of Condition of a Subject is a sum or an integral of acceptabilities of these four components. "Happiness" is the upper limit of the maximization of PCS; a subject is constantly striving to maximize PCS or to reach for happiness. An attitude of a subject to a phenomenon in the center of his or her attention is determined by the synchronous PCS. Belief/disbelief is a verbalized positive/negative attitude. Desire of a phenomenon x is a change of PCS created by the act of perceiving/imagining the phenomenon; the strength of desire is the magnitude of this change |ΔPCSx|. Desire of a phenomenon characterizes power of the PCS maximization possessed by this phenomenon. Need is a periodic desire; the desire correspondent to need is a concrete form of existence of this need. Choice is determined by comparative strength of the desirabilities of the competing elements of choice; it includes choice of the phenomena to perceive or attend. The attention of a subject toward a perceived phenomenon x is proportional to the strength of its desirability: ATTx=k|ΔPCSx| = k|DESIREx|. The distribution of attention is a function of the desirabilities of phenomena perceived at the time : ATTtotalt=k|DES1t|+k|DES2t|+…+|DESnt|. Will is an ability of the subject to influence the balance of desirabilities of elements of the subject's choice in the predetermined way. The nature of the will's effort is a self-inducement of suitable emotions through activation of memories by the concentration of the subject's attention to them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Desire and Selfhood.James Mensch - 2015 - The European Legacy 20 (7):689-698.
Choice Architecture: Improving Choice While Preserving Liberty?J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2013 - In Christian Coons & Michael Weber (eds.), Paternalism. Cambridge University Press.
Трансформація бажання в суспільстві «постспоживання».Lidiia M. Gazniuk & Mykhailo V. Beilin - 2020 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 63:59-70.
Humanistic Intention of Dystopia in "The Giver" by Lois Lowry.A. O. Muntian & I. V. Shpak - 2021 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 20:78-88.
From Phenomenology to Ethics: Intentionality and the Other in Marion’s Saturated Phenomenon.Cheongho Lee - 2017 - Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (116):63-83.
Ortega y el fenómeno de la atención.Jorge Montesó-Ventura - 2015 - Revista de Historia de la Psicología 36 (2):47-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
1 (#1,912,644)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander Ovsich
Boston College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references