Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2012)
AbstractWhat would be a fair model for flood insurance? Catastrophic flooding has become increasingly frequent in the UK and, with climate change, is likely to become even more frequent in the future. With the UK's current flood insurance regime ending in 2013, we argues that: - there is an overwhelming case for rejecting a free market in flood insurance after 2013; - this market-based approach threatens to leave many thousands of properties uninsurable, leading to extensive social blight; - there are a number of possible flood insurance models that would be fairer and more sustainable. We outline three approaches to 'fairness' in flood insurance, and argues that the second and third of these would be the most 'solidaristic' – i.e. those at lower risk of flooding would contribute to the support of people at higher risk: 'pure actuarial fairness' – insurance costs directly reflect the level of risk faced by individuals; 'choice-sensitive fairness' – insurance costs should reflect only those risks that result from each individual's choices; 'fairness as social justice' – insurance should be provided independently of individuals' risks and choices when covering basic requirements of social justice.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3):185-246.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Forms and Limits of Insurance Solidarity.Turo-Kimmo Lehtonen & Jyri Liukko - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (S1):33-44.
The Genetics Revolution, Economics, Ethics and Insurance.Patrick L. Brockett & E. Susan Tankersley - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (15):1661-1676.
Genetic Tests in the Insurance System: Criteria for a Moral Evaluation.Felix Thiele - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):185-195.
Human Genes and Neoliberal Governance: A Foucauldian Critique.Antoinette Rouvroy - 2008 - Routledge-Cavendish.
A Note on Optimal Insurance in the Presence of a Nonpecuniary Background Risk.Béatrice Rey - 2003 - Theory and Decision 54 (1):73-83.
Against Beck: In Defence of Risk Analysis.Scott Campbell & Greg Currie - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):149-172.
An Experiment on Rational Insurance Decisions.Richard Watt, Francisco J. Vázquez & Ignacio Moreno - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):247-296.
Adverse Selection In Group Insurance: The Virtues of Failing to Represent Voters.Robin Hanson - unknown
Stochastic Models for Disability: Approximations and Applications to Sickness and Personal Accident Insurance.Annamaria Olivieri & Ermanno Pitacco - unknown
Uberrima Fides, Foucault and the Security of Uncertainty.Luis Lobo-Guerrero - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):23-37.