- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The fallibility argument for inconsistency
Philosophical Studies 56 (1):95 - 102 (1989)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Doris Olin, ed., William James: Pragmatism In Focus. [REVIEW]Wesley Cooper - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13:329-332.
Doris Olin, ed., William James: Pragmatism In Focus Reviewed by.Wesley E. Cooper - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (6):329-332.
William James: Pragmatism in focus: Doris Olin (ed.)(London: Routledge, 1992), viii+ 251 pp. ISBN 0-415-04057-4 Paperback£ 12.99, ISBN 0-415-04056-6 Hardback£ 40.00. [REVIEW]Cheryl Misak - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (1):123-129.
Fallibility (Comments on P. Klein's "The Virtues of Inconsistency".Marta Fehér - 1990 - Epistemologia 13 (2):337.
Olin, Quine, and the surprise examination.Charles S. Chihara - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (2):191 - 199.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#104,651)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#104,651)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo