Snyder and Shapiro’s Critique of Pseudo-Singularity

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):226-231 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Call a term ‘pseudo-singular’ if it is syntactically singular but semantically plural. ‘The pair who wrote Principia’ is a good example, standing as it does for the two individuals, Whitehead and Russell. In this journal (2021), Eric Snyder and Stewart Shapiro launched an attack on the idea, calling it ‘linguistically and logically untenable.’ In this reply we rebut every one of their criticisms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strategies for a Logic of Plurals.Timothy Smiley Alex Oliver - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):289-306.
The Universe among Other Things.Achille C. Varzi - 2006 - Ratio 19 (1):107–120.
Stuff.Kristie Miller - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):1 - 18.
The Paradox of Identity.William J. Greenberg - 1996 - Epistemologia 2 (2):207-226.
The universe.Peter Simons - 2003 - Ratio 16 (3):236–250.
Cognitivism, Significance and Singular Thought.Rachel Goodman - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):236-260.
The Singular Nos in Vergil.E. H. W. Conway - 1921 - Classical Quarterly 15 (3-4):177-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-25

Downloads
10 (#1,222,590)

6 months
10 (#308,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alex Oliver
Cambridge University
Timothy Smiley
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references