Model-based science: diverse perspectives, little cross-disciplinary dialogue

Metascience 27 (3):453-456 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11016-018-0327-x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Model-based science: diverse perspectives, little cross-disciplinary dialogue: Lorenzo Magnani and Tommaso Bertolotti : Springer handbook of model-based science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2017, 1179pp, US$399.99HB.Guilherme Sanches de Oliveira - 2018 - Metascience 27 (3):453-456.
Cyborg futures: Teresa Heffernan (ed.): Cyborg futures: cross-disciplinary perspectives on artificial intelligence and robotics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 187pp, £39.99 HB.Susan Smith - 2021 - Metascience 30 (1):67-70.
The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: The Power of Cross-Disciplinary Practice.Graham Hubbs, Michael O'Rourke & Steven Hecht Orzack (eds.) - 2020 - New York, NY, USA: CRC Press.
Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: the story of the Toolbox Project.Michael O'Rourke & Stephen J. Crowley - 2013 - Synthese 190 (11):1937-1954.
Economic Aspects of Science: Editor's Introduction.Mike Thicke - 2013 - Spontaneous Generations 7 (1):1-5.
Measuring Interdisciplinary Research Categories and Knowledge Transfer: A Case Study of Connections between Cognitive Science and Education.Alan L. Porter, Stephen F. Carley, Caitlin Cassidy, Jan Youtie, David J. Schoeneck, Seokbeom Kwon & Gregg E. A. Solomon - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (4):582-618.
Taking stock of the metaphysics of science debate: drawing disciplinary frontiers. [REVIEW]Cristian Soto - 2017 - Metascience 26 (2):1-5.
Autonomous Self and Inter-Processual Self: Two Ways of Explaining How People “See” and Live Relationships and the Resulting Dialogue Between Science and Faith.José Víctor Orón, Kleio Akrivou & Germán Scalzo - 2019 - In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 91-101.
Morality and the elephant.K. R. Gibson, Klaus Zuberbiihler, Lorenz Gygax, Nerida Harley & Hans Kummer - 2000 - In Leonard Katz (ed.), Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. Imprint Academic. pp. 52.
Interfaith Dialogue and the Science‐and‐Religion Discussion.James F. Moore - 2002 - Zygon 37 (1):37-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
11 (#1,166,624)

6 months
5 (#710,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guilherme Sanches de Oliveira
Technische Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references