Abstract

Formation of the subject of true in A. Badiou’s neosophistical anthropology is investigated. In the concept he shows that only on crossing of three basic fields – the subject, true and event –such space of thought is formed, as philosophy. Only on their crossing patrimonial procedures can be developed: mathema, a poem, the politics and love, - which together initiate philosophy formation. A. Badiou asserts that in a certain situation the subject initiates true formation and further remains fidelity to this event of true. Only those thinkers in the history of philosophy which could compare a number of things and a number of thoughts and to construct corresponding ontology, could resolve the unity and plurality conflict. In such sense ontology acted in classical thinking not only as a science about being, but also as a science about articulation of thoughts. Possibly, therefore that thinkers which it has constructed the ontology of pluralities, was possible to achieve heuristical results in a science and philosophy. Such ontologies resolved an eternal problem of language on association individual and the general. Following works of M. Heidegger and J. Lakan, A. Badiou transfers the true and being conflict to the theory of sets, that is there where there is a necessity to be counted up, the ontological situation of occurrence of set opens. The true in A. Badiou’s concepts does not keep in language and in this sense is not called, but it reveals only through patrimonial procedures. However, patrimonial procedures are carried out only in a situation opening a patrimonial subset. This subset is formed in game of patrimonial forces. A. Badiou connects modern thinking with efficiency of patrimonial forces. Bible «in the beginning there was a word» and Greek «logos rules the world» turns at the French thinker in «in the beginning there was a generation», that is system of related relations initiating formation of thought, according to what further a generation develops. The society signs to itself a sentence, where the true disappears. Any social system can not exist in isolated space.