Effect of explicit trial-by-trial information about shock probability in long interstimulus interval GSR conditioning

, &
Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):145 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0034313

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Gsr conditioning with long interstimulus intervals.Mitchel C. Morrow & Thomas E. Keough - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (3p1):460.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Kenneth W. Spence & Eugenia B. Norris - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):716.
Interstimulus interval and time estimation in ratings of signaled shock aversiveness.Milton D. Suboski, Tonnar G. Brace, Louise A. Jarrold, Kurt J. Teller & Richard Dieter - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (2):407.
Time estimation and the interstimulus interval function in classical conditioning.Kurt J. Teller, Richard Dieter & Milton D. Suboski - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):445.
Effect of interstimulus interval on conditioning of voluntary instructed responses.Lawrence C. Perlmuter, Alan M. Fink, Gary A. Taylor & Gregory A. Kimble - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):403.
Effects of stimulus complexity, interstimulus interval, and masking task conditions in differential eyelid conditioning.Melanie J. Mayer & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):469.
Human eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Harold D. Fishbein & Mary Leblanc - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):130.
The influence of the inter-trial interval on the Humphreys' 'random reinforcement' effect during the extinction of a verbal response.David A. Grant, John P. Hornseth & Harold W. Hake - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (5):609.
Recruitment, latency, magnitude, and amplitude of the GSR as a function of interstimulus interval.William F. Prokasy, James T. Fawcett & John F. Hall - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5):513.
Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Harvey C. Ebel & William F. Prokasy - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):52.
Interstimulus interval and CS duration effects in differential conditioning.Laird S. Cermak & Delos D. Wickens - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):233.
One-trial aversive conditioning to contextual cues: Effects of time of shock presentation on freezing during conditioning and testing.J. H. Roald Maes & Jo M. H. Vossen - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (5):403-406.
Effects of trace versus delay conditioning, interstimulus interval variability, and instructions on UCR diminution.William W. Grings & Anne M. Schell - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):136.
Growth of a percept as a function of interstimulus interval.Gerald M. Murch - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
24 (#654,246)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Learned and perceived reinforcer response strengths and image theory.Donald L. King - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (5):438-441.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references