Social justice, psychology, and outdated epistemologies: Commentary on Sugarman, Stam, Teo, and Walsh

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 35 (2):135-139 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Appointment of new editor.No Authorship Indicated - 2008 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):iii-iii.
Psychology and social justice: Theoretical and philosophical engagements.Michael Arfken & Jeffery Yen - 2014 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 34 (1):1-13.
What is social justice? Implications for psychology.Erin Thrift & Jeff Sugarman - 2019 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 39 (1):1-17.
Editor's note.Ronald B. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):ii-ii.
The personal and political economy of psychologists’ desires for social justice.Richard T. G. Walsh & Ravi Gokani - 2014 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 34 (1):41-55.
The virtues of a psychology of personal morality.Vincent A. Punzo & Naomi M. Meara - 1993 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):25-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-27

Downloads
17 (#896,762)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deliberative public opinion.Kieran C. O’Doherty - 2017 - History of the Human Sciences 30 (4):124-145.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references