Prolegomena to a Study of Beings of Reason in Post-Suarezian Scholasticism, 1600–1650

Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):117-141 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In 1597 Francisco Suárez published a comprehensive treatise on beings of reason (entia rationis) as part of his Disputationes metaphysicae. Subsequent scholastic philosophers vigorously debated various aspects of Suárez’s theory. The aim of this paper is to identify some of the most controversial points of these debates, as they developed in the first half of the seventeenth century. In particular, I focus on the intension and the extension of ‘ens rationis’, its division (into negations, privations and relations of reason) and its causes. Additionally, I will discuss how Suárez’s views sparked a number of debates within the classical view, debates which ultimately led to the emergence of various alternative theories, especially among the Jesuits. These non-classical views radically revise the previous classical conception of beings of reason.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,273

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suárez on Beings of Reason.Bernardo J. Canteñs - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):171-187.
Suárez on Forms, Universals and Understanding.Erik Åkerlund - 2009 - Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (2):159-182.


Added to PP

39 (#339,527)

6 months
6 (#160,175)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel D. Novotný
University Of South Bohemia

Citations of this work

‘The Pope and Prince of All the Metaphysicians’: Some Recent Works on Suárez.Sydney Penner - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):393 - 403.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references