- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
10. Meaning and Objective Being: Descartes and His Sources
In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 223-242 (1986)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Descartes and the Ontology of Everyday Life, by Deborah J. Brown and Calvin G. Normore.Eric Stencil - 2021 - Mind 132 (526):568-577.
1. The Structure of Descartes’ Meditations.Amélie Oksenberg Rorty - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 1-20.
11. Is There Radical Dissimulation in Descartes’ Meditations?Louis E. Loeb - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 243-270.
2. The Naive Narrator: Meditation in Descartes’ Meditations.L. Aryeh Kosman - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 21-44.
Descartes, bare concepts, and anti-individualism: Reply to Normore.Tyler Burge - 2003 - In Martin Hahn & Björn T. Ramberg (eds.), Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge. MIT Press.
4. Semel in vita: The Scientific Background to Descartes’ Meditations.Daniel Garber - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 81-116.
Essays on Descartes’ Meditations.Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.) - 1986 - University of California Press.
21. Why Was Descartes a Foundationalist?Frederick F. Schmitt - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 491-512.
5. Descartes and the Metaphysics of Doubt.Michael Williams - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 117-140.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-09
Downloads
29 (#539,334)
6 months
25 (#143,954)
2023-06-09
Downloads
29 (#539,334)
6 months
25 (#143,954)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Logic and Ontological Pluralism.Jason Turner - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):419-448.
Descartes on "What we call color".Lawrence Nolan - 2011 - In Primary and secondary qualities: the historical and ongoing debate. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 81.
Objective Being and “Ofness” in Descartes.Lionel Shapiro - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):378-418.
Spinoza on the Limits of Explanation.Karolina Hübner - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):341-358.
Existential Import in Cartesian Semantics.John N. Martin - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):211-239.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo