Cartesian Truth [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):735-738 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Vinci’s express aim is two-fold: “to show that Cartesian epistemology has more power and plausibility overall than contemporary philosophers are willing to admit, and to defend Descartes’s rule of truth”. Vinci’s interpretation is highly original, systematic, and carefully argued, though some readers will find its analytic style forbidding. In developing his reconstruction of Descartes’ epistemology, Vinci covers a wide range of problems in Cartesian scholarship. He offers sensitive treatments of such issues as the Third Meditation causal principle, the three grades of sensation, material falsity, sensation and representation, clarity and distinctness, the teachings of nature, and much more. Vinci’s most provocative work concerns Descartes’ handling of the senses. Vinci argues that in contrast with the mostly negative view of the senses portrayed in the Meditations, the Principles of Philosophy presents a more optimistic view. On this optimistic account, Descartes holds that the senses underwrite a form of direct intuition of corporeal/brain states.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
34 (#466,590)

6 months
6 (#509,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lex Newman
University of Utah

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references